RESEARCH PAPER
Reliability of the Internet as a source of information in opinions of university students in Lublin
More details
Hide details
1
Doktorant Zakładu Matematyki i Biostatystyki Medycznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie
2
Studentka Wydziału Pielęgniarstwa i Nauk o Zdrowiu, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie
3
Samodzielna Pracownia Metod Informatycznych i Zdalnego Nauczania, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie Zakład Informatyki i Statystyki Zdrowia, Instytut Medycyny Wsi w Lublinie
4
Zakład Matematyki i Biostatystyki Medycznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie
Corresponding author
Damian Marek Szymczyk
Wydział Pielęgniarstwa i Nauk o Zdrowiu, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie, Al. Racławickie 1, 20-059 Lublin
Med Og Nauk Zdr. 2015;21(4):422-427
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The rapid development of the Internet, as well as the possibility to include in it any contents, results in a constant increase in information. This is related with difficulty with finding reliable and tried contents. Therefore, it is important to possess the skills of filtration and verification of the information sought, especially in the domain of medicine. It is noteworthy that although Polish society increasingly more frequently searches for health information on websites, the reliability of medical professions does not decrease.
Objective:
The objective of the study is evaluation of the reliability of the Internet as a source of information concerning complaints and methods of treatment based on practical use of this information by the students’ community in Lublin.
Material and Methods:
A survey was conducted in May 2012 among students of Lublin universities: Medical University, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, University of Natural Sciences, and Lublin University of Technology. An anonymous questionnaire contained 15 items, including one open question.
Results:
According to the students, the most reliable source of information concerning disorders and methods of their treatment is a physician or a pharmacist; however, in the situation of the occurrence of pathological symptoms, a considerable percentage of respondents (73.8%) first use the Internet and not medical advice.
Conclusions:
Despite the fact that students critically approach information on the Internet concerning the state of health, they are not aware that the information obtained cannot replace medical advice. In addition, students have no skills in selecting the medial contents on websites, and their verification.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Badanie CBOS. Internauci 2013. Warszawa 2013.
http://www.cbos.pl/ SPISKOM.POL/2013/K_075_13.PDF (dostęp: 2014.04.01).
2.
Ulatowska-Szostak E, Marcinkowski JT, Gromadecka-Sutkiewicz M, Krzywińska-Wiewórowska M, Stawińska-Witoszyńska B. Badania nad Internetem jako źródłem informacji o chorobie. Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2009; 90(2): 246–253.
3.
ARC Rynek i Opinia. Internet leczy skutecznie?
http://www.arc.com. pl/internet_leczy_skutecznie-41999450-pl.html (dostęp: 2014.04.01).
5.
Beckjord EB, Finney Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Arora NK, Volckmann L, Moser RP et al. Use of the internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS). J Med Internet Res. 2007; 9(3): e20.
6.
Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998; 1: 2–4.
7.
Witucki M. Wstęp. W: World Internet Project Polska 2011. http:// bi.gazeta.pl/im/6/10726/m10726616,WORLD-INTERNET-PROJECT POLSKA-2011-RAPORT-V.pdf (dostęp: 2014.04.01).
8.
Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: Evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. BMJ 1998; 317: 1496–1502.
9.
Malec J. Polski pacjent w Internecie. OSOZ. 2012; 10: 24–25.
13.
Pentor Research International. Polskiego pacjenta portret własny. http:// www.polpharma.pl/katalogiflashowe/mNDn3Z9nZnqRmA.html (do¬stęp: 2014.04.01).
14.
Biesaga T. Autonomia lekarza i pacjenta a cel medycyny. Med Prakt. 2006; 6: 20–24.
15.
Doroszewska A. Wpływ Internetu na zachowania w zdrowiu i choro¬bie. W: Popielski K, Skrzypek M, Albińska E, red. Zdrowie i choroba w kontekście psychospołecznym. Lublin: KUL; 2010: 299–311.
16.
Chmura R, Łach K. Samoleczenie a zdrowie publiczne. W: Krajewski¬-Siuda K, red. Samoleczenie. Warszawa: Instytut Sobieskiego; 2012: 31–97.
17.
Drozd M, Jaremek-Kudła J, Kijewska A. Farmaceuta w procesie samoleczenia. W: Krajewski-Siuda K, red. Samoleczenie. Warszawa: Instytut Sobieskiego; 2012: 147–155.
21.
Wyatt JC. Commentary: Measuring quality and impact of the world wide web. Br Med J. 1997; 314: 1879–1881.
22.
Akerkar SM, Bichile LS. Health information on the Internet: patient epowerment or patient deceit? Indian J Med Sci. 2004; 58(8): 321–326.