PL EN
REVIEW PAPER
Methodological dissimilarities in studies of herbal medicinal products from the aspect of WHO recommendations
 
More details
Hide details
1
Studenckie Koło Naukowe przy Zakładzie Etyki i Filozofii Człowieka, Uniwersytet Medyczny, Lublin
 
2
Zakład Etyki i Filozofii Człowieka, Uniwersytet Medyczny, Lublin
 
 
Corresponding author
Oliwia Bachanek   

ul. Dworcowa 17/6, 08-530 Dęblin międzynarodowe.
 
 
Med Og Nauk Zdr. 2015;21(4):378-382
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Scientific studies on herbal medicinal products, including randomized controlled trials, are being conducted worldwide. At the time of evidence based medicine, the quality and standardization of research is still elevated to the a higher level. One of the important reasons for such a situation is publication of the relevant guidelines by international organizations, such as the WHO.

Objective:
Analysis of methodological differences in research on herbal medicinal products.

Material and Methods:
Review of available literature concerning methodological differences in research on herbal medicinal products, including European Union documents and the WHO guidelines.

Results:
The above-mentioned methodological differences apply to all stages – from cultivation of herbal medicinal product through its preliminary processing to obtaining final standardized product, also the construction of research protocol and selection of population into the control and experimental groups. In the case of herbal medicinal products, there are also more numerous environmental, social and cultural interactions than in the case of research on synthetic substances.

Conclusions:
Conclusions drawn from clinical studies are one of the pillars of modern medicine; however, these studies must be properly conducted to enable proper interpretation. Conducting clinical trials on herbal medicinal products may make herbal therapy a fully-fledged branch of medicine, and the knowledge obtained from these studies may facilitate making clinical decisions.

REFERENCES (20)
1.
Przybycień-Szczęsny M. http://www.nil.org.pl/dzialaln... (dostęp 11.04.2015).
 
2.
Jenicek M, Hitchcock D. Evidence-Based Practise: Logic and Critical Thinking in Medicine, American MedicalaAssiociation Press (AMA Press), 2005. Chapter 4.3: 118–137.
 
3.
Weidenhammer W, Lewith G, Falkenberg T, Fønnebø V, Johannessen H, Reiter B, Uehleke B, von Ammon K, Baumhöfener F, Brinkhaus B. EU FP7 Project ‘CAMbrella’ to Build European Research Network for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Forsch Komplementmed 2011; 18: 69–76.
 
4.
Dyrektywa 2004/24/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 31 marca 2004 r. zmieniająca dyrektywę 2001/83/WE w sprawie wspólnotowego kodeksu dotyczącego produktów leczniczych stosowanych u ludzi, w odniesieniu do tradycyjnych ziołowych produktów leczniczych.
 
5.
Tilburt JC, Kaptchuk TJ. Herbal medicine research and global health: an ethical analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86(8): 594–9.
 
6.
Kędzia B, Hołderna-Kędzia E. Działanie miodu na drobnoustroje wyizolowane z zakażonych ran. Post Fit. 2014; 15(1): 40–43.
 
7.
Eardley S, Bishop F, Prescott P, Cardini F, Brinkhaus B, Santos-Rey K, I wsp. http://www.homeopathyeurope.or... (dostęp 2015.08.11).
 
8.
Girard L, Vohra S. Ethics of Using Herbal Medicine as Primary or Adjunct Treatment and Issues of Drug-Herb Interaction. In: Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S, editors. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. 2nd edition. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2011. Chapter 21.
 
9.
 
10.
Pęgiel-Kamrat J, Zarzeczna-Baran M. Kulturowe zachowania studentów medycyny w zdrowiu i chorobie. Ann Univ Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sect. D Med.2005; 60(16): 313–317.
 
11.
https://fedora.phaidra.univie.... Get (dostęp 2015.02.29).
 
12.
World Health Organisation. http://www.wpro.who.int/public... pub_9290611103/en/ (dostęp 2015.04.11).
 
13.
World Health Organisation. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/20..._ EDM_TRM_2000.1.pdf (dostęp 2015.04.11).
 
14.
World Health Organisation. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publi... (dostęp 2015.04.11).
 
15.
World Health Organisation. http://apps.who.int/medicinedo... assoc/s14878e/s14878e.pdf (dostęp 2015.04.11).
 
16.
Agbabiaka TB, Guo R, Ernst E. Pelargonium sidoides for acute bronchitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phytomedicine. 2008; 15(5): 378–385.
 
17.
Karsch-Völk M, Barrett B, Kiefer D, Bauer R, Ardjomand-Woelkart K, Linde K. Echinacea for preventing and treating the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 2: CD000530.
 
18.
Hisano M, Bruschini H, Nicodemo AC, Srougi M. Cranberries and lower urinary tract infection prevention. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012; 67(6): 661–667.
 
19.
Liu ZL, Liu ZJ, Liu JP, Yang M, Kwong J. Herbal medicines for viral myocarditis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (7): CD003711.
 
20.
Chen W, Zhang Y, Li X, Yang G, Liu JP. Chinese herbal medicine for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 10: CD007796.
 
eISSN:2084-4905
ISSN:2083-4543
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top