RESEARCH PAPER
Analysis of the sources of knowledge concerning family planning among women in the Lodz area
More details
Hide details
1
Zakład Położnictwa Praktycznego, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Łodzi
Corresponding author
Barbara Wrońska
Zakład Położnictwa Praktycznego,
ul. Narutowicza 58, 90-130 Łódź
Med Og Nauk Zdr. 2014;20(4):365-369
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Aim:
The main aim of the research was analysis of the sources of knowledge about conscious preparation for motherhood
of women aged 17–35 living in a big urban agglomeration.
Material and Methods:
The research tool was a questionnaire survey, conducted among 455 women aged 17–35, living
in the Lodz agglomeration. The developed questionnaire included questions concerning sources of knowledge and the
normative (preferred by respondents) sources of knowledge about proper family planning. The material collected was
analyzed using t-Student tests for average and fractions, and chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression methods
for multivariate analysis. For statistical inference, the accepted level of statistical significance is not higher than α = 0.05.
Results:
Women received knowledge about family planning most often from their parents – 54%, least often from nurses
and midwives – 8.7%. Women’s awareness concerning the necessity to obtain knowledge in the area of family planning
from the health care staff increased with age (α <0.05). The regression equation has shown that this frequency increased
by 2% for each year of a woman’s life. Most often women, would expect knowledge about family planning to come from
parents – 82.2%, 60% from teachers and 52.7% from doctors.
Conclusions:
1) The source of knowledge about family planning most frequently mentioned by women were their parents.
2) In the opinion of the women, knowledge about family planning should be communicated by parents, teachers and
health care workers. 3) Many more women expect to obtain more knowledge than they actually receive from nurses and
midwives. 4) Together with women›s age, their awareness about the need of using the knowledge about family planning
from health professionals (doctors, nurses and midwives) is increasing. 5) Together with age, the opinion about the need
to transfer knowledge by teachers about family planning is decreasing.
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Guillebaud J. Antykoncepcja – pytania i odpowiedzi. Wydanie II. Kraków: Wyd. Med Prakt. 2005.
2.
Chazan B. Opieka przedkoncepcyjna. Medipress Ginekologia 1998; 4(3): 10–5.
3.
Romera-Modamio G, Fernandez-Lopez A, Jordan Garcia Y, et al. Embriofenopatia alkoholica. An-Esp- Pediatr. 1997; 47(4): 405–9.
4.
Stadnicka G. Opieka przedkoncepcyjna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2009.
5.
Nowosielski K, Drosdzol A, Skrzypulec V, i wsp. Seksualność młodych dorosłych województwa śląskiego. Gin Prakt. 2005; 2(83): 32–9.
6.
Filipp E, Pawłowska A, Wilczyńska A, i wsp. Metody planowania rodziny u nastolatek. Ginek Prakt. 2005; 85(4): 46–52.
7.
Siwik E, Lew-Starowicz Z. Antykoncepcja. Planowanie rodziny w progu XXI w. Warszawa: Wyd. EMMM – PRESS; 2003: 34.
8.
Sieja K, Leoński J, Bulsa M, i wsp. Program wychowania seksualnego w Polsce na tle innych krajów europejskich. Gin Prakt. 2000; 8(51): 30–3.
9.
Kozakiewicz M. Wychowanie seksualne i planowanie rodziny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Movex; 1997: 5.
10.
Opinie o potrzebie wychowania seksualnego w szkołach. Komunikat z badań CBOS, Warszawa, luty 1998. Dostępny w Internecie: http:// www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/1998/K_023_98.PDF.
11.
Zielińska M. Promocja zdrowia reprodukcyjnego kobiet: problemy społeczne i dylematy etyczne. Praca doktorska, UM Wydz. Nauk o Zdrowiu, Kat. Nauk Humanistycznych, Zakład Socjologii Międzyuczelnianej, Łódź 2008.